Archive for January, 2007



What do you think?

So we are seeing a true shift of power from the Big Media to the people.
The war which is being waged now by the people is against the professional middlemen in general.
Professional middlemen fatten themselves by blocking the free flow of information.
Professional middlemen include, but not limited to, lawyers, bankers, real estate agents, editors, retailers, […]

Academic physicists are collaborators Big Media uses to infiltrate and corrupt science education. What is the real importance of this observation?
The importance is that human science is defined by the unhuman Big Org and not by humans themselves. The Big Media controls the content of science through textbooks, peer reviewed journals and bestsellers. Whatever you […]

In the nineteenth century free thinking painters challenged academic schools and established the modern art. Academic physics has yet to achieve its scientific revolution.
Notice how much academic physics is the same as academic painting had been. In both cases education consists of teaching of the dogma. The academic doctors have reduced Old Masters into immutable […]

Cosmogonic mythology

Dear Bee and Stefan,
I read your response carefully and I made every effort to understand what you wrote. I still don’t believe that you offer a scientific justification for extrapolating from known to unknown.
I thank both for helping and I look forward to your comments. Sorry if I appear to take this too seriously. I […]

Scholastic Doctors of Physics at Cosmic Variance have been raving about some measurements made by other scholastic Doctors of Physics at University of Washington.
Doctors Sean Carrol, Mark Trodden, Chad Orzel and Rob Knop are Doctors of Philosophy who have commented on this measurement. All these doctors assume that measurements made by Kapner et al is […]

Who is for science

Everyone is defending science.
Everyone is for science.
Scholastic Doctors of Philosophy who adopted and then corrupted the good word physics call what they are doing science.
There is a group of amateurs who are not professional doctors and they are doing their own research for their own curiosity. They are calling what they are doing science.
I am […]

It is 2060. A historian of science looks at 2007. What does he see?
In 2060 Newton’s reign has been over for about a decade. The post Newtonian generation has no respect for Newton’s authority. Newton is seen as the second Aristotle who corrupted human reason for over three centuries. Students are no longer indoctrinated with […]

Where is your allegiance?

Thanks to Bee at Backreaction for commenting here.
Bee wrote: Physics is not philosophy or sociology, in which you can debate the meaning and use of words according to their context and history. Take the words ‘poverty’ or ‘hunger’….
Thanks for bringing up “poverty” and “hunger.” How does the definition of force in physics differ from “poverty” […]

1. If an evidence is not publicly legible the evidence is not evidence.
“This is why we publish our research results…. You just have to read them.”
Here someone writes about a Google product called Academic Translator Beta which translates academic papers into plain English. Apparently this tool eliminates all of the high level notation and makes all the […]

I believe that Nature is rational. Not surprisingly physicists too claim that Nature is rational. Physicists believe that nature is absurd and irrational but claim that nature is rational. It is irrelevant what physicists claim. Look at deeds not words. Look at all those absurd theories invented by physicists. Physicists’ allegiance is not with rationality […]






Close
Powered by ShareThis