Archive for July, 2007
Hunt the Higgs: the card game.
Search for Future Influence from L.H.C.
affiliate officer loanloan housing application affordablebankruptcy after auto loan bestloan guaranteed after bankruptcy personalpersonal bankruptcy loan after risk highloan agricultural indialoan motorcycle americacar financing america loan finance one Map
ShareThis
The Cavendish Anomaly
0 Comments Published by admin July 30th, 2007 in Doctors of Philosophy, String Theory, Cavendish ExperimentAt Theorema Egregium nc quoted Imre Lakatos:
Scientists … do not abandon a theory merely because facts contradict it. They normally either invent some rescue hypothesis to explain what they then call a mere anomaly or, if they cannot explain the anomaly, they ignore it….
I would change “scientists” to “physicists” because this is a trick physicists, […]
This image1 is a good analogy of physicists’ understanding of constitution of matter:
Here’s a collider where two fluids collide and form new forms of the same fluid.
Physicists too let fluid collide with fluid and observe “ultimate fundamental and indivisible constituents of matter” in the resulting fluid.
Photographed by Harold Edgerton [↩]ShareThis
Scott McNealy asks
why is California paying some $400 million annually to update K-12 textbooks?
The answer is
to perpetuate the state religion called Newtonism.
There is perfect synergy between governments and the Big Media. Neither the Big Media nor the state has the benefit of the students in mind. Both aim to increase their profits by selling textbooks that […]
The physics canon is immutable
2 Comments Published by admin July 27th, 2007 in Physics, Doctors of PhilosophyChristine Dantas asks: Is there more to gravity than gravitons? What prompted her question was T. Padmanabhan’s From Gravitons to Gravity: Myths and Reality.
She wonders if the issues raised by Padmanabhan are indeed correct and if so, how would they be interpreted in string theory.
Padmanabhan writes:
There is a general belief, reinforced by statements in standard textbooks, […]
Physicists have zero scientific integrity
3 Comments Published by admin July 26th, 2007 in Doctors of Philosophy, Freedom of ScienceIn this article called “How the LHC came to be,” Chris Llewellyn Smith proudly details the obscene bureaucratic ways of the Europeans. It seems that Europeans did not make any progress in their understanding of science since the Middle Ages. Europeans still negotiate the last penny they could extract from their traditional enemies for their […]
Gamow on the Cavendish experiment
0 Comments Published by admin July 25th, 2007 in Cavendish ExperimentGeorge Gamow wrote1 that Henry Cavendish
demonstrated the proof [of the existence of the Newtonian force] beyond argument.
What kind of evidence does Gamow have to declare so authoritatively that Cavendish proved the existence of the Newtonian force “beyond argument?”
Just like Feynman, Gamow’s source is physics textbooks. We know that physics textbooks are canonized physics mythology.
What I found […]
Feynman on the Cavendish experiment
0 Comments Published by admin July 24th, 2007 in Cavendish ExperimentIn his Lectures on Physics Richard Feynman wrote that Cavendish measured the Newtonian force for the first time. I don’t have that book handy but a search in Google Books revealed Feynman’s The Character of Physical Law where he repeats the same claim and he even uses the same graphic for the experiment.
Feynman starts with […]
I compared physics to tax code. There was an objection to that. Physics is not like the tax code. Ok. If physics is not like the tax code what is it like?
What kind of objects is physics made of?
I see two different kinds of objects in physics:
1. Strings
2. Magnitudes
String objects include:
Definitions
Principles
Axioms
Labels
Placeholders
Commentary
Polemics
Philosophy
Argument by authority
Opinion
Speculations
Scenarios
Press releases
Most of […]
There is a very nice discussion going on at Physics Forum regarding the Cavendish Experiment. I wrote about the two tests that I want to try here and I really appreciate the thoughtful comments at Physics Forums.
I am arguing that the linear force of the wire cannot balance the dynamic Newtonian force which varies as […]
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for July, 2007.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.