Archive for October, 2007
Cavendish experiment 3
0 Comments Published by admin October 21st, 2007 in Physics, Cavendish ExperimentTommaso Dorigo advises to approach orthodoxy on a negotiation basis. (See comments to this post.)
This is great advice.
One possible problem with it is that holders of orthodoxies usually would not be open to negotiating their orthodoxy.1 This is compounded by the fact that the only exchange a Doctor will have with a non-doctor is teacher-student relationship. No […]
Sabin Hossenfelder of Backreaction writes about her trip to New York City. She has a nice photo taken by a friend she just met through her blog. On her way back to Perimeter Institute a customs officer mistakes her for a theological physicist.
For me there is no mistake. Theoretical physics is theological physics. I have […]
Kepler’s Rule R^3=T^2 was a first in human history. The earliest person who understood this fact was Newton. He then promptly appropriated Kepler’s Rule and branded it Newton’s laws.1 When we eliminate Newtonian propaganda we recognize Kepler’s Rule as the only rule of motion known to humans.
Ever since humans looked at the sky they tried […]
Li of Physics
11 Comments Published by admin October 18th, 2007 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, General RelativityBrowsing in Borders yesterday I saw this little book called Li: Dynamic Form in Nature1 by David Wade.
Li reflect the order and pattern in Nature … but it is not pattern thought of as something dead, like a mosaic: it is dynamic pattern as embodied in all things living, and in human relationships, and in […]
Unlike String Theorists I have a testable claim. I claim that force does not exist. Even more specifically I say that Cavendish pendulum did not move under the influence of Newton’s force.
For me the proof is simple:
Force is occult
Occult does not exist
Therefore, force does not exist.
Physicists do not agree with the above reasoning.
In physics only what […]
I like reading God Plays Dice written by Isabel Lugo. She writes about probability and statistics in a very readable way. A few weeks ago I placed a comment asking her to write a post about a common statement that cosmologists make about the Universe. Cosmologists claim that
99 per cent of the universe’s contents are […]
Ray Streater writes:
Galileo had to cope with Aristotle’s dictum that a force was needed to keep a body moving; when Galileo had abandoned this, he broke the 2000 year stalemate in science…
Galileo freed motion from force. Newton tied motion and force once again by reintroducing force into physics. Newton’s disciples still enforce Newton’s dictum of […]
I was watching this video of Roger Penrose at Perimeter Institute giving a lecture called Are we due for a new revolution in fundamental physics? This is the kitschy slides interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. One of his slides is this Quantum Mermaid:
The title reads: A new angle on the basic paradox of quantum mechanics. Mermaid […]
ADE = the ruling class made of unhuman organisms
DEFG = physicists, the middlemen or the interface, used by the unhuman organisms to exploit the human population FGBC.
Additional thoughts
In order to sustain this hierarchical society personality cults must be created and maintained by the professional classes DE for the ruling organisms ADE. This creates an […]
Physicists are faced with the same problem as Madonna.1 They are exploited by a giant organism who takes their professional product without just compensation. The difference is in degree only.
The situation can be expressed mathematically like this
Madonna feels that the Big Label shortchanges her. Madonna wants Big Label to pay her $N but Big Label […]
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for October, 2007.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.