Archive for February, 2008



Physicists like to contrast physics with religion. In current usage physics is a pun for science and physicists exploit this pun and use physics interchangeably with science. But the contrast is not between science or physics and religion but between science and legal. Here’s what I mean.
Is physics pseudo-science?
There is a lot of talk going […]

Open Questions 1

Why is it that I cannot find the answers to simple questions that I have been investigating in this blog? I made a list below. I stated them as propositions that need to be evaluated.
I believe that what makes finding answers difficult is that there is no standard of evidence in physics. There is no […]

Change Physics

I recognize that Change Physics is the same problem as Change Congress. But I think that Changing physics is even more impossible than changing the Congress. After all Physics has been around as a bureaucracy for over 5000 years. Yes, this bureaucracy has been changing its name to adjust to the changing times but it […]

The ultimate goal of mathematics is to eliminate any need for intelligent thought. [Alfred N. Whitehead] 

In this article Isabel Lugos is propagating the oldest scholastic propaganda. Willingly or unwillingly, I do not know. This propaganda asserts that Doctors of Philosophy are supremely more intelligent than non-doctors:
I_Docs >> I_non-Docs
Lugos adds to this claim a twist by […]

John Baez and Mike Stay have a new paper called Physics, Topology, Logic and Computation: A Rosetta Stone. I believe that Mike Stay is writing the Computation section which is not yet available. In this post I have some general comments to make about the comparison of physics and computation as studied in the introductory […]

The original article titled Don’t become a scientist! is here. And a similar article: Women in Science. And this: College is waste of time and money. And Academic Science isn’t that bad.
First I notice that Katz is using science as a pun for physics. This is indeed a funny pun. Although mistaking religions to be science […]

Newton used Kepler’s rule the way an evil genius would have used a mass destruction weapon to annihilate the world. Newton used his weapon to design an occult world. Newton annihilated rationalism.1
Newton’s secret weapon was Kepler’s Rule. Newton redefined Kepler’s Rule to be Newton’s laws and wrote a book to legislate Newton’s laws as the […]

The Force. Yes, that Force

Gizmodo writes:
The Force. Yes, that Force. Or like physicists call it, the Higgs boson. Or God particle.
It doesn’t really matter what physicists call it. The Force is still the same occult Newtonian Force.

ShareThis

Who needs peer review

John Baez asks for help for a paper he is writing with Mike Stay. Within hours highly qualified people start posting good quality advice.
John Baez’ post proves once and for all that academic peer review has nothing to do with science and it is in fact an impediment to the free flow of information. Peer […]

Some thoughts on the mission of the Freedom of Science blog. What is Newtonism? Can it be toppled? Does it need to be?
Also available here in wiki format.
The best case scenario
In the best case scenario

scientific authority is transferred to the people
Newtonism is exposed as religion
Kepler’s rule is recognized as fundamental
Newtonian occult is removed from science

When […]






Close
Powered by ShareThis