Archive for March, 2008
Inflation
0 Comments Published by admin March 23rd, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, cosmologyA Babe in the Universe writes:
Nearly 30 years ago Alan Guth and others suggested that the early Universe expanded at warp speed, many times faster than light. This inflation would violate both the First Law of Thermodynamics and Relativity’s stipulation that nothing travels faster than light. A divergence of inflation theories has grown up, containing […]
Marketing Einstein any which way
2 Comments Published by admin March 22nd, 2008 in Marketing, Doctors of PhilosophyFunny conjunction of physicists with pirates:
But I only know how to talk like a Pirate!
Trust us, Physicists are way cooler. Pirates are, well, pirates. What they do is completely illegal; it is just a matter of time before they are caught and get 25-30 yrs in federal prison for being crackpots.
On the other hand, physicists […]
Force is occult 3
0 Comments Published by admin March 21st, 2008 in Science, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Force, OccultFor scientists, force is occult therefore it does not exist; no other proof is needed.
What does not exist is the cause of nothing.
For physicists, force is legal, it doesn’t matter if it is occult.
To legalize the occult physicists even defined a unit for it and called the unit by the name of the founder […]
Cavendish experiment is not an experiment
0 Comments Published by admin March 20th, 2008 in Doctors of Philosophy, Cavendish Experiment, Force, OccultI’ve written a few times that
Force is occult
Force never set any pendulum in motion
Cavendish experiment is not an experiment
Let me explain the last item one more time:
1. Cavendish builds a pendulum with a given period and measures the given period.
2. What Cavendish measures is already given.
Given as in known. If you know it you don’t […]
Is Newtonian physics secretly Keplerian?
5 Comments Published by admin March 19th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, Lisi Affair, Puns, KeplerFor physicists Newton’s laws are sacred.1 When Nature contradicts Newton’s laws physicists add an amendment to the law to save Newton’s authority. String Theory is such an amendment invented to explain an imaginary singularity2 in Newton’s force definition. It never occurs to physicists to discard Newtonian legislature no matter how strongly Nature rejects it.
In practice, […]
Contrary to what physics mythology claims Cavendish experiment cannot be interpreted as the first measurement of the Newtonian force. Cavendish assumed the Newtonian force, he never tried to measure it. The experiment is not set up to verify the existence of force.1
No combination of wire, beam and weights can prove the existence of the […]
Force is occult
0 Comments Published by admin March 17th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, Cavendish Experiment, ForceGravitational physics is physicists’ never ending quest to save Newton’s authority. All astronomical calculations are done by using Kepler’s Rule branded as Newton’s laws.1
As long as physics exists physicists will call Kepler’s Rule Newton’s laws. Therefore, it is not possible to prove that planets are not moved by Newton’s force. Physicists corrupted the old science […]
An existence test for Newton’s force
1 Comment Published by admin March 16th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, ForceWhen I realized that in physics force was a legal concept I tried to find a test such that when applied to force it would reveal if it exists or not. The simplest test to check if force exists is to inspect the effective formulas used in astronomical computations.
Proposition:
If force does not enter computations […]
Lexical corruption
0 Comments Published by admin March 15th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, PunsA good example of how lexical corruption promoted by academic physicists enters the trenches is shown by this claim by some physicists that they’ve created a black hole in fiber optics.
Black hole is a physic. Physics is a collection of physics and proud of it.
But criticism of physics as a profession is futile.
Criticizing physics is […]
Foundations of Analysis
0 Comments Published by admin March 15th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of PhilosophyAlexandre Borovik refers to Edmund Landau’s Foundations of Analysis.
A beautiful page from the book. Compare it to Standard Model Lagrangian. SM Lagrangian is the product of an ugly bureaucracy. It makes no sense to call those two things mathematics as if they were the same.
ShareThis
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for March, 2008.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.