Archive for the 'Doctors of Philosophy' Category
Is Calculus a dead language?
0 Comments Published by admin April 24th, 2008 in Education, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, Calculus, Computer scienceFrom Dreams of Calculus - Perspectives on Mathematics Education:1
Classical Greek or Latin formed an important part of secondary education only 50 years ago, with motivations similar to those currently used for mathematics: studies in these subjects would help develop logical thinking and problem solving skills. Today, very few students take Greek and Latin with […]
Newtonian multiplication
0 Comments Published by admin April 23rd, 2008 in Authority, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, MatterThe ignorance or willing negligence of data types allows physicists to write absurd statements such as
Physicists are very proud of the logo of the House of Newton but what does it mean to multiply two masses?
It is
absurd
physical
Type Newton
In the multiplication
both M and m are type Newton. Yesterday we saw that little m, […]
Data types of F=ma
0 Comments Published by admin April 22nd, 2008 in Faith, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, ForceI’ve been trying to decipher the data types of F, m and a in physicists’ expression F=ma. I still do not know for certain. I believe the standard interpretation by physicists is that force F is proportional to acceleration a
and mass m is the proportionality constant.
Is force a physical quantity?
For a proportionality to […]
Newton and Einstein: the crucial difference
0 Comments Published by admin April 21st, 2008 in Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, EinsteinShtetl-Optimized says:
At no point did Einstein ever embrace mysticism per se. That’s another crucial difference between him and Newton . . .
Einstein was practicing mysticism when he claimed to compute the radius of the ultimate reality.1 Mysticism is the claim of “achieving communion or conscious awereness of ultimate reality through direct experience, intuition or […]
Ode to Einstein
1 Comment Published by admin April 20th, 2008 in Physics, Marketing, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, General RelativityTO THE ILLUSTRIOUS MAN
ALBERT EINSTEIN
AND THIS HIS WORK DONE IN FIELDS OF THE
MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS A SINGLE
DISTINCTION OF OUR TIME AND RACE
Lo, for your gaze, the pattern of the skies!
What balance of the relativistic mass, what reckonings
Divine! Here ponder too the Laws which Subtle Lord,
Framing the DeSitter universe, set not aside
But made the relative foundations […]
Is there a limit to possible spacetimes?
0 Comments Published by admin April 19th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of PhilosophyShareThis
The post-Newtonian world
0 Comments Published by admin April 19th, 2008 in Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, cosmology, Calculus, A new worldI’ve updated the Introduction to my new post-Newtonian world:
Traditionally, the job of designing new worlds has been the responsibility of Doctors of Philosophy, but modern Doctors of Philosophy, the physicists, have become nothing more than careerist bureaucrats1 and the grandest scheme they can think of is to reconcile the two incompatible parts of the physics […]
Astrology and physics: two occult para-sciences
0 Comments Published by admin April 18th, 2008 in Authority, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, Force, OccultThis is adapted from comments:
If someone turned off gravity right now, then all currently orbiting planets would just fly out at tangents.
Interesting point. In pre-Newtonian times people proved the truth of astrology by the same type of circular reasoning. The believers said that astrology is true because if it weren’t the astrological influx between […]
Theory of Everything and Godel’s incompleteness theorem
2 Comments Published by admin April 17th, 2008 in Authority, Doctors of Philosophy, cosmologyA commenter yesterday wrote regarding Max Tegmark’s mathematical universe that
maybe our universe is a mathematical object . . . but can we understand this object? Can we solve the equations? I seriously doubt it, we are already having troubles with Navier-Stokes, let alone Dirac coupled with Maxwell, and even with classical mechanics. I rest my […]
Universe is academic
12 Comments Published by admin April 16th, 2008 in Doctors of Philosophy, cosmologyI’ve written before about Max Tegmark’s proposition that the universe is mathematics. I just saw it highlighted in Mathematics under the Microscope and I wanted to add a few more comments.
I’m not surprised that academic doctors have discovered that the Universe is not just described by an academic discipline but it is an academic […]
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for the 'Doctors of Philosophy' category.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Latest
- What is the relation between Newton’s laws and Kepler’s rule?
- Axioms, algorithms and scientific revolutions
- Physics does not deal with laws
- Newton is the new Aristotle
- Physics and metaphysics
- How did Newton spin rotation into orbits
- What if string theory is wrong?
- Does physics admit casuistry?
- Ugly side of buildings
- Nature’s maze
