Archive for the 'Law' Category
The necessity for legal action
0 Comments Published by admin March 29th, 2008 in Physics, Humans, LawAt some point I was thinking that legal action must be taken against unhuman organisms that enforce corruption of human science:
Physics hierarchy
Education
Big media
The state.
Unhuman is the enemy of human. What does unhuman do? Unhuman organisms exploit humans to further their own unhuman goals. The best example of this is the unhuman organisms who profit by […]
A physicist in the Congress
0 Comments Published by admin March 28th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, LawAn organism such as the US Congress is a “system” no different than so-called “physical systems” investigated by physicists. There is an apparent difference if you look at individual components. Physics apparently investigates systems that cannot consciously change the system within the system. But the Congress too cannot change its own state.
Take a snapshot of […]
The Supreme Court of Science
0 Comments Published by admin November 4th, 2007 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Law, LawyersWould the evidence for Big Bang stand in a court of law? Not in the court of physics but in a court of law? Since physicists are judge, jury and the accused, an evaluation of mythologies of their own creation will necessarily be biased, to say the least. Physicists cannot evaluate scientifically their own theories […]
Is signal matter?
0 Comments Published by admin May 1st, 2007 in Authority, Physics, Law, Matter, LawyersJudging from history of physics patent offices must have a deep connection with fundamental research. Yesterday I looked at the argument in Microsoft v. AT&T where lawyers discuss if software can be patented.
The law allows only four categories to be patentable: “process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter.” Therefore, to find out if software is […]
IV. Scientific Method
0 Comments Published by admin January 23rd, 2007 in Science, Authority, Physics, Doctors, LawIn parts I, II and III we have declared Newtonism to be an arbitrary standard invented in the 17th century to extend the British political colonialism into the colonialism of the mind.
By defining self-serving standards British Newton and his followers have successfully branded nature as Newtonian. It is an absolute God-given truth that at the […]
III. Mathematical Principles of Anthropic Principle
0 Comments Published by admin January 22nd, 2007 in Wordpress, Science, Physics, Doctors, LawAs mathematically proved by advances recently made in Anthropic Principle the Laws of Nature exist solely to be discovered by Doctors of Physics.
The Anthropic Principle says that we are living in a landscape such that if Laws of Nature did not exist just for the purpose of being discovered by Doctors of Physics scholasticism would […]
II. Laws of nature demystified
2 Comments Published by admin January 21st, 2007 in Uncategorized, Physics, Doctors, LawIn scholastic physics a law of nature is defined as an inherent quality of the undefined word “nature.”
Only in physics an undefined word can be said to obey arbitrary definitions Doctors of Physics call laws.
Don’t confuse a law of nature with a principle.
A principle is an arbitrary definition invented by Doctors of Physics to endow […]
Newtonism is an arbitrary standard established to unify European science.
The word arbitrary may appear to be placed there arbitrarily and the reader may think it should be removed to raise the standard of the sentence.
Newtonism is a standard established to unify European science makes sense since we may argue that all standards are arbitrary anyway.
This […]
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for the 'Law' category.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.