Freedom of Science

The ignorance or willing negligence of data types allows physicists to write absurd statements such as

Physicists are very proud of the logo of the House of Newton but what does it mean to multiply two masses?
It is

absurd

physical

Type Newton
In the multiplication

both M and m are type Newton. Yesterday we saw that little m, […]

The rule describing orbits does not contain a term for matter or mass.
This rule is R^3 = T^2.
The rule relates radius of the orbit to its period.
The relation is not between radius and period and matter. The relation is between radius and period and nothing else. Matter, mass, body, object… these are not part of […]

Physics is not suitable for fundamental research. Physics is useless to investigate philosophical problems. Physicists have absolute authority to define what they study as science. They defined old scholastic topics as physics and therefore as science. In other words, physicists call millennia old philosophical topics physics. The best example is when physicists delve into the […]

Judging from history of physics patent offices must have a deep connection with fundamental research. Yesterday I looked at the argument in Microsoft v. AT&T where lawyers discuss if software can be patented.
The law allows only four categories to be patentable: “process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter.” Therefore, to find out if software is […]

How corrupted modern physics is!
No physicist ever observed any fundamental building block of matter. How can there be fundamental building blocks of matter when there is no matter.
No particles were ever smashed in any “particle” accelerator. Physicists observe traces of motion, the history of motion, and as dogmatic priests of Newtonist atomic materialist religion they […]