Archive for the 'Occult' Category
Fundamental equation of physics
2 Comments Published by admin April 29th, 2008 in Authority, Physics, Newton, Force, OccultTo me F=ma is an absurd statement which is equal to
Here’s the derivation: F is the Newtonian force. By definition the Newtonian force acts instantaneously from a distance. Therefore, for the Newtonian force all distances are zero. As far as F is concerned radius R of any orbit is zero because F traverses any […]
Astrology and physics: two occult para-sciences
0 Comments Published by admin April 18th, 2008 in Authority, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, Force, OccultThis is adapted from comments:
If someone turned off gravity right now, then all currently orbiting planets would just fly out at tangents.
Interesting point. In pre-Newtonian times people proved the truth of astrology by the same type of circular reasoning. The believers said that astrology is true because if it weren’t the astrological influx between […]
Scientific principles of research
0 Comments Published by admin April 17th, 2008 in Science, Newton, Force, Occult, PrinciplesWe have principles here:
1. Nature is not supernatural.
2. Rational is not irrational.
I use these two scientific principles as the foundation of my research.
For instance, I use Principle 1 to eliminate the Newtonian occult force from physics:
Force is action-at-a-distance therefore force is occult. Occult is supernatural and, by Principle 1, nature is not supernatural, […]
The sad, sad state of physics
0 Comments Published by admin April 15th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, OccultWrites nullphysics.com:
Physics is currently in a sad, sad state. Theorists have, upon their global failure to provide coherent solutions to nature’s toughest questions, chosen to relinquish much of their responsibility. They have reached the internally-agreed-upon consensus that their job is not to explain reality, their one and only job is to describe it, using models […]
Scholastic baggage in physics
0 Comments Published by admin April 14th, 2008 in Faith, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, OccultI’ve been writing that physicists are in the way of freeing the concept of force from centuries old scholastic baggage. In fact, it’s not the physicists per se but it’s the physics bureaucracy that makes impossible any progress to eliminate occult qualities of scholasticism from physics. The marketing name of this old scholastic bureaucracy may […]
When I use the word force I mean the occult1 action-at-a-distance force invented by Newton. The table below lists the two kinds of forces:
Force disambiguation
Mechanics
Occultics
Fcontact = mweight a
Foccult = moccult a
Contact force
Action-at-a-distance Occult force
Interactions by contact
Interactions by occult between intelligent mass
Force and weight are relevant
Force and mass are decorative and cancel
Like most concepts in […]
At the heart of the issue is Newton’s use of Kepler’s rule. What did Newton do to Kepler’s rule? There are two versions describing Newton’s actions. One is the official physics mythology. The other is the historical record.
Maybe the way I described these two versions is biased. I called the physicists’ version to be the mythology […]
I am surprised that this blog has drawn the attention of bad science activists. These are individuals who are out there to protect science from its bad versions such as pseudo-science and anti-science. I think that’s a worthy goal.
My research is based on the principle that occult is supernatural and it is not part of […]
Force is occult 3
0 Comments Published by admin March 21st, 2008 in Science, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Force, OccultFor scientists, force is occult therefore it does not exist; no other proof is needed.
What does not exist is the cause of nothing.
For physicists, force is legal, it doesn’t matter if it is occult.
To legalize the occult physicists even defined a unit for it and called the unit by the name of the founder […]
Cavendish experiment is not an experiment
0 Comments Published by admin March 20th, 2008 in Doctors of Philosophy, Cavendish Experiment, Force, OccultI’ve written a few times that
Force is occult
Force never set any pendulum in motion
Cavendish experiment is not an experiment
Let me explain the last item one more time:
1. Cavendish builds a pendulum with a given period and measures the given period.
2. What Cavendish measures is already given.
Given as in known. If you know it you don’t […]
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for the 'Occult' category.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Latest
- What is the relation between Newton’s laws and Kepler’s rule?
- Axioms, algorithms and scientific revolutions
- Physics does not deal with laws
- Newton is the new Aristotle
- Physics and metaphysics
- How did Newton spin rotation into orbits
- What if string theory is wrong?
- Does physics admit casuistry?
- Ugly side of buildings
- Nature’s maze
