Archive for the 'Physics' Category
Fundamental equation of physics
2 Comments Published by admin April 29th, 2008 in Authority, Physics, Newton, Force, OccultTo me F=ma is an absurd statement which is equal to
Here’s the derivation: F is the Newtonian force. By definition the Newtonian force acts instantaneously from a distance. Therefore, for the Newtonian force all distances are zero. As far as F is concerned radius R of any orbit is zero because F traverses any […]
The Newtonian occult in General Relativity
0 Comments Published by admin April 28th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, NewtonNewton was a crank and a recluse and a religious bigot who spent much of his time dwelling in a self-generated fog of superstition and crankery . . . says Christopher Hitchins.1 I guess Newton still had enough quality time left to orchestrate one of the greatest upheavals in European history. Newton was able to […]
The universal local/global pun
0 Comments Published by admin April 27th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, PunsUrs Schreiber in article Charges and Twisted Bundles, III: Anomalies writes:
They are called “anomalies”, I’d say, because to a large extent in physics the approach is to pretend that working locally is fine – until one happens to run head-on into global issues. A mathematician might say at this point: “We made a mistake at […]
Orbital motion and Newton’s authority
Closed Published by admin April 26th, 2008 in Authority, Physics, NewtonIn their derivation of orbital motion physicists write down the mass m of the orbiting satellite and later cancel it and they conclude correctly that the orbit is not dependent on m, as stated on this NASA page:
There is an important concept evident in all three equations – the period, speed and the acceleration [i.e. […]
Physics derivation of Kepler’s rule from Newton’s laws
2 Comments Published by admin April 25th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, Kepler, Force, Newtonism1. F=ma
Physicists start their derivation with
This statement may be meaningful to physicists but the truth is that all three terms, F, m and a, disappear during the derivation. None of these Newtonian terms enter the formula used to compute orbits. From this observation we must conclude that F, m and a are not quantities that […]
Data types of F=ma
0 Comments Published by admin April 22nd, 2008 in Faith, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, ForceI’ve been trying to decipher the data types of F, m and a in physicists’ expression F=ma. I still do not know for certain. I believe the standard interpretation by physicists is that force F is proportional to acceleration a
and mass m is the proportionality constant.
Is force a physical quantity?
For a proportionality to […]
Ode to Einstein
1 Comment Published by admin April 20th, 2008 in Physics, Marketing, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, General RelativityTO THE ILLUSTRIOUS MAN
ALBERT EINSTEIN
AND THIS HIS WORK DONE IN FIELDS OF THE
MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS A SINGLE
DISTINCTION OF OUR TIME AND RACE
Lo, for your gaze, the pattern of the skies!
What balance of the relativistic mass, what reckonings
Divine! Here ponder too the Laws which Subtle Lord,
Framing the DeSitter universe, set not aside
But made the relative foundations […]
Is there a limit to possible spacetimes?
0 Comments Published by admin April 19th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of PhilosophyShareThis
Astrology and physics: two occult para-sciences
0 Comments Published by admin April 18th, 2008 in Authority, Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, Force, OccultThis is adapted from comments:
If someone turned off gravity right now, then all currently orbiting planets would just fly out at tangents.
Interesting point. In pre-Newtonian times people proved the truth of astrology by the same type of circular reasoning. The believers said that astrology is true because if it weren’t the astrological influx between […]
The sad, sad state of physics
0 Comments Published by admin April 15th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, OccultWrites nullphysics.com:
Physics is currently in a sad, sad state. Theorists have, upon their global failure to provide coherent solutions to nature’s toughest questions, chosen to relinquish much of their responsibility. They have reached the internally-agreed-upon consensus that their job is not to explain reality, their one and only job is to describe it, using models […]
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for the 'Physics' category.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Latest
- What is the relation between Newton’s laws and Kepler’s rule?
- Axioms, algorithms and scientific revolutions
- Physics does not deal with laws
- Newton is the new Aristotle
- Physics and metaphysics
- How did Newton spin rotation into orbits
- What if string theory is wrong?
- Does physics admit casuistry?
- Ugly side of buildings
- Nature’s maze
