Archive for the 'Principles' Category
From Imaginary Potential
. . . that the simple rules of cellular automata can somehow generate fundamental laws of physics.
To me such a claim does not make sense. How can one derive laws from other laws? Laws are definitions. Newton’s laws are definitions Newton called “axioms or laws of motion.” All “laws of physics” are such […]
Scientific principles of research
0 Comments Published by admin April 17th, 2008 in Science, Newton, Force, Occult, PrinciplesWe have principles here:
1. Nature is not supernatural.
2. Rational is not irrational.
I use these two scientific principles as the foundation of my research.
For instance, I use Principle 1 to eliminate the Newtonian occult force from physics:
Force is action-at-a-distance therefore force is occult. Occult is supernatural and, by Principle 1, nature is not supernatural, […]
Search
Try Google Custom Search for Freedom of Science
About
You are currently browsing the Freedom of Science weblog archives for the 'Principles' category.
Longer entries are truncated. Click the headline of an entry to read it in its entirety.Latest
- What is the relation between Newton’s laws and Kepler’s rule?
- Axioms, algorithms and scientific revolutions
- Physics does not deal with laws
- Newton is the new Aristotle
- Physics and metaphysics
- How did Newton spin rotation into orbits
- What if string theory is wrong?
- Does physics admit casuistry?
- Ugly side of buildings
- Nature’s maze