<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crooked timber of scholasticism</title>
	<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/crooked-timber-of-scholasticism/</link>
	<description>Transfer scientific authority to people</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Fine Physics at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/crooked-timber-of-scholasticism/#comment-17214</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/crooked-timber-of-scholasticism/#comment-17214</guid>
					<description>[...] Read the rest here.  I believe that experimental physicists, even astronomers who see their field corrupted by string theorists, ought to support this separation. [&#8617;]Natalie Jeremijenko fun club. Crooked timber of scholasticism. Good physics v. fine physics. Standard of evidence. [&#8617;]Although calling someone like Lubos Motl &#8220;fine&#8221; in any context would be a bit too much even for people who would approve of this separation. [&#8617;]ShareThis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Read the rest here.  I believe that experimental physicists, even astronomers who see their field corrupted by string theorists, ought to support this separation. [&#8617;]Natalie Jeremijenko fun club. Crooked timber of scholasticism. Good physics v. fine physics. Standard of evidence. [&#8617;]Although calling someone like Lubos Motl &#8220;fine&#8221; in any context would be a bit too much even for people who would approve of this separation. [&#8617;]ShareThis [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
