Evidence in physics
Published by admin September 13th, 2007 in Faith, Physics, Doctors of PhilosophyLet M1 to M8 be types of representation of phenomena:
M1 = Faith
M2 = Belief
M3 = Guess
M4 = Conjecture
M5 = Speculation
M6 = Hypothesis
M7 = Theory
M8 = Model
Therefore, the list is ordered by
S_n = M_n/E
where S = Science and E = Evidence.
Example 1:
S1 = M1/E is division by zero.
This proves that where there is faith there is no science:
M1/E = religion
Physics is a belief system based on faith and therefore it is a religion.1 In physics division by zero is legal so for physicists M1/E where E=0 is a “scientific” statement. A physicist reading this will be unable to understand why M1/E where there is no evidence is not science.
There is no standard of evidence in physics. There is, on the other hand, an absolute hierarchy of authority. Physicists’ doctoral authority overrules any evidence any time.
Example 2:
S8 = M8/E = Science
A properly built model where faith and physics laws and doctrines play no role contains maximum amount of evidence. A model is built on evidence not principles and laws. Once again physics is proved to be religious speculation. Physicists build models based on their faith not on evidence.
- Can physicists offer any evidence against this statement? No. They can only offer their faith marketed as laws of nature. [↩]