<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Physics v. Fine Physics</title>
	<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/good-physics-v-fine-physics/</link>
	<description>Transfer scientific authority to people</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Fine Physics at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/good-physics-v-fine-physics/#comment-20751</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/good-physics-v-fine-physics/#comment-20751</guid>
					<description>[...] Read the rest here.  I believe that experimental physicists, even astronomers who see their field corrupted by string theorists, ought to support this separation. [&#8617;]Natalie Jeremijenko fun club. Crooked timber of scholasticism. Good physics v. fine physics. Standard of evidence. [&#8617;]ShareThis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Read the rest here.  I believe that experimental physicists, even astronomers who see their field corrupted by string theorists, ought to support this separation. [&#8617;]Natalie Jeremijenko fun club. Crooked timber of scholasticism. Good physics v. fine physics. Standard of evidence. [&#8617;]ShareThis [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Category-object numbers for physics at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/good-physics-v-fine-physics/#comment-12902</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/good-physics-v-fine-physics/#comment-12902</guid>
					<description>[...] Physics too is a legal profession and physicists routinely make even more outrageous claims. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Physics too is a legal profession and physicists routinely make even more outrageous claims. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
