Or, more generallly, the doctrine of quantum indeterminism.

I don’t know enough about Copenhagenism to comment in detail but what I know is that quantum mechanics, (therefore, Copenhagenism, I would think) is the product of Newtonism. Newtonism is the professional hierarchical bureaucracy based on a legal code called physics. This bureaucracy creates these “mechanics” which means “legal code” in this profession.

The reason quantum mechanics exists is physicists’ absolute faith in Newtonism and their mistake of believing that there is a singularity at r=0. So I would suggest that when Newtonism is gone all these legal mechanics invented by physics bureaucrats such as Bohr, Heisenberg, Pauli and so on that you cite will come down as well.

Or, more generallly, the doctrine of quantum indeterminism.

The “godfathers” of this doctrine were Neils Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli, Max born and John von Neumann, who, from 1927 to 1935, together managed to persuade the very large majority of physicists that there was no way in which quantum behaviour could be visualised or accounted for in terms of the hidden variable behaviour of objects in motion beyond the diectly observeed and measured results of experiements. While the weight of their argument held sway against the protestations of Albert Einstein, Irwin Schrodinger and Louis de Broglie, the last of whom did develop a quite detailed hidden variables interpretation of quantum mechanics, which he called the pilot wave theory.

But a strong enough argument against the quantum indetrminist doctrine was not developed until Bohmian quantum mechanics waas first developed in 1952, and by which time quantum indeterminisms in one form or other was as institutionalised as as any religious dogma, if not more so.
See eg: http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~oldstein/papers/qts/node4.html
David Bohm’s work could thus be successfully villified by the godfathers, as well as ignored and ostracised by the rest of the physics community, who by then who getting heavily into the beginnings of quantum field theory, which is a complex mathematical device whereby the question of hidden variables can be disregarded.

But then one could think that David Bohm’s development of a hidden varaibles quantum mechanics was, necessarily, insufficient. And so that from none of the evidence found on the smallest scale of matter and the energy it radiates could it be definitely shown that or how the cause that Bohm called the quantum potential acts universally in addition to the forces…