Freedom of Science

Imagine a circle. Let the inside of the circle be the observable world. Cosmologists and physicists agree that there is no information coming from outside of this circle.

• First principle of cosmology: We do not know what is outside of the observable world.

Therefore what is observed is local. Extrapolation from the local to the universal is fraud.

No information is coming from outside of the circle. Therefore, we do not know the universe as a whole.

• To admit that we do not know what we do not know is science.
• To define what is not known and sell it as absolute truth is theology.

Therefore an assumption of the unknown such as the Big Bang is religion.

To claim experimental verification of theology is fraud. Or a hoax. Or both. But not science.

[Original NASA WMAP picture is here.]

How can physicists pretend to know what they do not know and still pretend to be scientists? Physicists say no radiation is coming from outside the circle then they say the radiation from the Big Bang is coming from outside the circle. Physicists are selling the observed universe as the whole universe.

Where is the error in this reasoning?

How can radiation come from outside of the circle of observations when it is assumed that no radiation is coming from outside of the circle of observations?

Dear reader, can you please explain to me as a rational person how can you assume that there is no radiation coming from outside the circle and also assume that there is radiation coming from outside the circle?

Thank you.

ShareThis