<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge divides</title>
	<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/</link>
	<description>Transfer scientific authority to people</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Change Physics at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-13609</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-13609</guid>
					<description>[...] I recognize that Change Physics is the same problem as Change Congress. But I think that Changing physics is even more impossible than changing the Congress. After all Physics has been around as a bureaucracy for over 5000 years. Yes, this bureaucracy has been changing its name to adjust to the changing times but it has been around since the pyramid builders ruled the Earth. Physics is the bureaucracy of the priestly scribes. When pharaohs lost their ruling power to ruling institutions scribes too incorporated themselves and became the professional doctors. The historical constant is the same bureaucracy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I recognize that Change Physics is the same problem as Change Congress. But I think that Changing physics is even more impossible than changing the Congress. After all Physics has been around as a bureaucracy for over 5000 years. Yes, this bureaucracy has been changing its name to adjust to the changing times but it has been around since the pyramid builders ruled the Earth. Physics is the bureaucracy of the priestly scribes. When pharaohs lost their ruling power to ruling institutions scribes too incorporated themselves and became the professional doctors. The historical constant is the same bureaucracy. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lisa Randall looking for angels at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-12828</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-12828</guid>
					<description>[...] Lisa Randall is a professional doctor of philosophy serving the scholastic physics hierarchy. This profession is an old one. Some say it is the oldest profession because scholasticism is as old as history. History itself started with written word. And written word was designed and controlled by scribes. Scribes were the first professional doctors. 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Lisa Randall is a professional doctor of philosophy serving the scholastic physics hierarchy. This profession is an old one. Some say it is the oldest profession because scholasticism is as old as history. History itself started with written word. And written word was designed and controlled by scribes. Scribes were the first professional doctors. 2 [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pioneer1</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-7772</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 04:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-7772</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the comment. I disagree with this conclusion. The way I see it a corporation does not have human body so it does not have human feelings. Psychopath it seems is a human attribute that bodyless corporation does not possess. To attribute psychopath behavior to a corporation would be unjustified anthropomorphism. But the corporation possesses the essential human attribute: ability to produce written text, or history. I think, that's why legally a corporation is considered a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. I disagree with this conclusion. The way I see it a corporation does not have human body so it does not have human feelings. Psychopath it seems is a human attribute that bodyless corporation does not possess. To attribute psychopath behavior to a corporation would be unjustified anthropomorphism. But the corporation possesses the essential human attribute: ability to produce written text, or history. I think, that&#8217;s why legally a corporation is considered a person.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kea</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-7738</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/knowledge-divides/#comment-7738</guid>
					<description>Interesting. I saw the documentary comparing characteristics of A Corporation with the diagnosis of a psychopath, and they were indeed very similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I saw the documentary comparing characteristics of A Corporation with the diagnosis of a psychopath, and they were indeed very similar.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
