<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multi-particle states in matterless universes</title>
	<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/multi-particle-states-in-matterless-universes/</link>
	<description>Transfer scientific authority to people</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: What&#8217;s physics is good for at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/multi-particle-states-in-matterless-universes/#comment-5296</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/multi-particle-states-in-matterless-universes/#comment-5296</guid>
					<description>[...] Ms. Hossenfelder describes her physics specialty as phenomenology. &#8220;Phenomenology&#8221; is the new &#8220;saving the phenomena&#8221; with the only difference that in physics the phenomena always happen in imaginary universes cooked up by physicists themselves. Furthermore, neither the earth nor the asteroid know anything about Deformed Special Relativity, another of Ms. Hossenfelder&#8217;s specialities, or the landscape, or string theory&#8230; Therefore, we must conclude that an ability to ignore what goes as physics today is a good qualification to compute orbits. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ms. Hossenfelder describes her physics specialty as phenomenology. &#8220;Phenomenology&#8221; is the new &#8220;saving the phenomena&#8221; with the only difference that in physics the phenomena always happen in imaginary universes cooked up by physicists themselves. Furthermore, neither the earth nor the asteroid know anything about Deformed Special Relativity, another of Ms. Hossenfelder&#8217;s specialities, or the landscape, or string theory&#8230; Therefore, we must conclude that an ability to ignore what goes as physics today is a good qualification to compute orbits. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Einstein&#8217;s field equations in smiley formalism at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/multi-particle-states-in-matterless-universes/#comment-4024</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/multi-particle-states-in-matterless-universes/#comment-4024</guid>
					<description>[...] A female phenomenologist who has the backing of famous Smolin from the Perimeter Institute has just published a winky paper on the relation of DSR and SADS in the peer backslapped journal Psychic Letters D and she tied everything nicely to soccer ball paradox. But since soccer ball paradox is a subset of the fortune cookie universe paradigm this whole thing makes perfect sense. If you are a physicist, that is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A female phenomenologist who has the backing of famous Smolin from the Perimeter Institute has just published a winky paper on the relation of DSR and SADS in the peer backslapped journal Psychic Letters D and she tied everything nicely to soccer ball paradox. But since soccer ball paradox is a subset of the fortune cookie universe paradigm this whole thing makes perfect sense. If you are a physicist, that is. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
