<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old science, new science</title>
	<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/</link>
	<description>Transfer scientific authority to people</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Pioneer1</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8414</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8414</guid>
					<description>So, when I notice that both a computer scientist and a physicist describe the world as connections am I doing category theory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, when I notice that both a computer scientist and a physicist describe the world as connections am I doing category theory?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carl Brannen</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8196</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8196</guid>
					<description>It's the "connections". And also the absence of predictive content, LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the &#8220;connections&#8221;. And also the absence of predictive content, LOL.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pioneer1</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8192</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8192</guid>
					<description>Only category theory I know I learned it from this &lt;a href="http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/guest-post-marni-d-sheppeard-is-category-theory-useful/" rel="nofollow"&gt;article. &lt;/a&gt; And that was a while back. I have to read it again carefully. Can you explain why you say that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only category theory I know I learned it from this <a href="http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2007/10/04/guest-post-marni-d-sheppeard-is-category-theory-useful/" rel="nofollow">article. </a> And that was a while back. I have to read it again carefully. Can you explain why you say that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kea</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8190</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/old-science-new-science/#comment-8190</guid>
					<description>Ah, you're a category theorist at heart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you&#8217;re a category theorist at heart!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
