Peer Review in Physics
Published by admin January 19th, 2008 in Science, Doctors of PhilosophyDoctor of Philosophy Sabine Hossenfelder declares that “peer review is an essential ingredient of science.”
I say that peer review is not an essential ingredient of science.
Peer review is a self-regulation rule invented by Doctors of Philosophy themselves to regulate their professional corruption so that they don’t cheat each other by publishing crap.
Doctors doctor, so they doctored and corrupted peer review and turned it into yet another corrupt scholastic institution in physics. Witness how Doctors corrupt science by defining a self-regulation rule of their profession as an essential ingredient of science.
You can read about the current rotten state of peer review system here. And that’s only what Doctors are willing to admit. As usual, Doctors are not blaming themselves or the corrupt system they have created but some other doctors who were chosen as scapegoats because they cut and pasted platitudes from other boilerplate papers. An ass with a golden saddle is still an ass. A crap physics paper peer reviewed to infinity is still crap.
Doctors of Philosophy claim that peer review is a fundamental tenet of science. This is a lie. Peer Review is a recent invention not more than 50 years old. Science is older than that. Newton is the greatest scientist of all times. At least, this is what Newton’s disciples have been telling us. Newton never heard of peer review. What a blasphemy to imply that Saint Newton the divine founder of physics is not a scientist because he never submitted his papers for approval by other corrupt doctors before publishing them. Einstein, the other saint of scholastic physics, used journals to publish. Einstein would not let editors send his submitted papers for review. So Einstein cannot be a scientist because he never considered peer review to be a part of the scientific process? Galileo never availed himself of the peer review simply because there was no peer review then. According to modern Doctors of philosophy Galileo is not a scientist. Archimedes, Aristotle, Descartes, Euler and Gauss are not scientists either. And what about Fermat? He was a pure amateur. He never published one single paper, peer reviewed or not. Therefore he cannot be a scientist.
Only Doctor Sabine Hossenfelder is a scientist because she published a paper in a peer reviewed journal about a still-born scholastic fad called deformed special relativity.
You see how doctors actively corrupt science in order to make it their own trademarked property. The doctoral propaganda is so strong that it doesn’t occur to you that Sabine Hossenfelder can be an anti-scientific Doctor of Philosophy just like the habit-wearing medieval old doctor-monks with ink stains on their hands and a cozy relation with the Inquisition. True there were no women Doctors then. True Doctor Hossenfelder cannot report you to the Inquisition. Don’t be fooled. Doctor Hossenfelder and her ilk are as dogmatic and shrewd doctors as any of their medieval ancestors. The profession is the same. Only its name changed. The same professional doctors now called physicists are corrupting science in front of your eyes. Same corrupt corrupters. Different century.
2 Responses to “Peer Review in Physics”