Physicists have known sin
Published by admin February 2nd, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophyand this is a knowledge which they cannot lose. They built weapons of mass destruction for unhuman organisms who used those weapons to kill and enslave humans for unhuman organisms’ own purposes not for the well-being of humans. Physicists conspired with unhuman organisms against humanity. They still do. Physicists belong to the oldest professional class used by ruling classes against humanity. How come we glorify physicists instead of punishing them for their collaboration with unhuman rulers?
Physicists believe they are above humanity. Their allegiance is with their profession. Just like mercenary soldiers they would switch to any side giving them the best opportunity to ply their trade. A good example is Wernher von Braun. Do von Braun’s rockets that revealed so much of the universe justify his military work? I don’t know.
You might find this lecture time as ignorance, algebraically entertaining. Be sure to turn the volume up loud enough to hear the questions.
Thanks for the reference. It’s nice that Perimeter Institute makes these talks available but their set up is awful. You don’t see the slides. You don’t see what is written on the blackboard. And the audio is not that great.
The discussion itself I found to be totally theoretical. This must have been the type of discussion medieval doctors of philosophy entertained themselves with discussing species of times they defined. The lecturer mentioned preferred time, kinematical time, dynamical time, state dependent time, state independent time, thermodynamical time, “our traditional notion of time,” and time as ignoring the detail of information.
Physics is puns. Time is a pun and he is hairsplitting puns of time and he sprinkled his lecture with “equations.”
Also I notice that it makes no sense to consider physicists to constitute a uniform monolith.
In the context of the original post I think these physicists have not known sin. I doubt that any military application will follow from this research.
I like your approach better, e.g. in your latest post, starting from a simple experiment.