Simulation

Everyone (here, here and here) agrees that you cannot simulate everything. If everything cannot be simulated how can physicists write the rule of everything? Physicist call the rule of everything Theory of Everything.

A simulation is a computer program, an algorith. Given a set of parameters representing perceptions it gives the same results as perceived. Theory of Everything, physicists such as Tegmark claim, will be an equation that will fit on a T-Shirt.1 This T-Shirt TOE will be a rule that will obviate the simulation algorith.

Algorithm for everything = Silly = Rule of everything = Sillier

There is only one way to simulate everything: Simulate a universe with nothing in it2 and define the empty universe to be the entire universe. When physicists talk about cosmology and Theory of Everything they are talking about this empty fairy tale universe and market it as the perceived universe. By the word “simulation” physicists understand “faking.” Then they define their faking as the real thing. This is fraud.

Intelligent Designers assign the design process to an unknown master designer. Physicists have no need for such a non-physicist meddling with their affairs so they design their own universe and define it as the true universe.

Both Intelligent designers and physicists are crooked professional doctors. They are at each other’s throat because they are fighting the modern version of the old academic turf wars. In Galileo’s time the dominant doctors were the theological doctors. Today the dominant doctors are the doctors of philosophy. Physicists’ religion is not Christianity but Newtonism. The parties are the same: Doctors v. doctors fighting to establish their own doctrine as the true doctrine. And unfortunately for humanity, physicists define this turf war to be science.

loan 502 section60 month car loanloan route 66700 dollar loanloan small 7a business20 calculator loan 80 20 mortgage90 home london loanhome loans 90 london Map

  1. ”it seems possible that the correct theory of everything could even turn out to be simple enough to describe with equations that fit on a T-shirt.” []
  2. the famous deSitter universe of scholasticism []

3 Responses to “Simulation”  

  1. 1 L Riofrio

    Computer simulations are not study of nature. My computer says that Lara Croft can run and fight with those boobs.

  2. 2 Pioneer1

    The problem is not with computer simulations. Physicists simulate matterless universes to test matterful universes. You can change the density parameters of the simulated world so that motion is easier for Croft or change the parameters of Croft. So I disagree. Computer simulations may be good study of nature.

  1. 1 Standard model at Freedom of Science





Close
Powered by ShareThis