Standard model of atomic materialism
Published by admin April 13th, 2008 in Physics, Doctors of Philosophy, Newton, MaterialismThe standard model of particle physics does not account for mass.1 There is a very simple explanation for this experimental fact: Mass does not exist.
The model built by Newtonian priests the physicists predicts that there is no mass.2 Newton the grand master of scholastic physics says there is mass. He defined it. He designed an occult world around force and mass. Who do you think will prevail? A mere experiment? Or Newton?
True. Standard model is more than a mere experiment, it’s the gold standard of physics bureaucracy. It’s passed all tests and it always makes the right predictions to justify the building of the next gen big physics colliders . . . yet physicists have a major disagreement with it: Standard Model contradicts the sacred authority of Master Newton. Standard Model says there is no mass. Newton says there is.
What to do?
Bring in Doctor Higgs to add yet another ad hoc term to doctor the Standard Model and save Newton’s sacred authority. This is the standard method of physics. Yet again physicists manage to save the doctrine.
| Standard Model | Newton |
|---|---|
| Atomic materialism | Atomic materialism |
| No mass | Mass |
| Anything goes | Occult force |
| Hidden Kepler’s rule (Lagrangian) |
Hidden Kepler’s rule (Newton’s laws) |
| Big physics experiment | Pendulum experiment |
- This observation comes from The Higgs appears by A babe in the Universe. [↩]
- No mass? Or no matter? Probably there is a deep physics pun here that I don’t understand. [↩]