Christine Dantas asks: Is there more to gravity than gravitons? What prompted her question was T. Padmanabhan’s From Gravitons to Gravity: Myths and Reality.

She wonders if the issues raised by Padmanabhan are indeed correct and if so, how would they be interpreted in string theory.

Padmanabhan writes:

There is a general belief, reinforced by statements in standard textbooks, that … one can obtain the full non-linear Einstein’s theory of gravity by coupling a massless, spin-2 field h_ab self-consistently to the total energy momentum tensor, including its own… The same textbooks which assert that Einstein’s theory can be obtained by coupling h_ab to itself self consistently will also state in some other section … that gravitational field does not have a well defined energy momentum tensor!

This is a very good proof of how broken physics is. And what a corrupt profession physics is.

The authority in physics lies in physics textbooks

Who pays the textbook writers? Universities? Funding agencies? No. Textbook writers work for the Big Publishers and the Big Media. Any physicist who limits her work to academia will provide free content to the Big Media to earn academic points1 and will live close to poverty level.2

Physics canon is physics mythology

These textbook writers copy from previous textbooks and canonize the physics mythology taught to physicists. In this particular case, the textbooks writers used mathematical fraud to perpetuate the General Relativity myth to make things work which do not actually work. This is what T. Padmanabhan’s main message is.

Physicists cannot alter the canon

In other words, discussions in blogs, and preprint archives and peer reviewed journals could never change the canon of physics established by the big media through hired hands called textbook writers.

The discussion about gravity and gravitons conducted by honest physicists are based on previous canonized statements full of authoritatively presented fraud and faked experiments. These discussions are pure intellectual exercises where the winning doctor may or may not collect some minor academic points.

Physics experiments are corrupt too

It is well known that the first verification of General Relativity was verification by authority conducted by Eddington under the orders of the British Government. Eddington’s observations did not prove General Relativity. The British agent Eddington’s authority coupled to New York Times’ authority overruled observations.3 Just considering this historic fact we see that academic physics has no credibility as science.

220 school barrington aesop districtsiemens keys ringtones m56 aliciabear spring bearington 2006ringtone 120e cellophane motorola freemotorola ringtone 230233330t freeregiment accrington palscarrington alexi measurements andfitness advocate barrington centerl goodshepherd Map

  1. No cash or even ownership, copyright belongs to the publisher. []
  2. Physicists are the lowest paid professionals even if we count such para-professionals as nurses as professionals. []
  3. General Relativity is the most frequently proved unproved theory ever. But this does not change the fact that physics allows verification of speculations by authority of governments. []

2 Responses to “The physics canon is immutable”  

  1. 1 Observer

    It’s all a big conspiracy (Big Pharma, Big Media, Big Government, Big Ass).
    Only the author, himself, personally, “Gnose” The Truth.

  2. 2 Pioneer1

    Observer,

    Thanks for your comment. I agree that Big Pharma fits in that club well. But I am not claiming that there is a conspiracy. On the contrary, everything is in the open for anyone to observe. You can read Eddington’s paper and see for yourself. You can verify that British Government blackmailed (it’s not known on what basis) and ordered him to come back with a verification (this was a running joke during the expedition.) These facts cannot be discussed in physics because the canon is sacred.

    The author of this post is not interested in “The Truth.” There is no discussion of truth here. As far as I am concerned, The Truth is an absolute concept which is outside of science. Science deals with errors, not absolutes. I would be interested in your thoughts on specific issues rather than The Truth.

    Thanks again for commenting.




Close
Powered by ShareThis