Freedom of Science

1. If a physicist knows that a physics experiment is fraud does he or she have the duty to expose the experiment as a fraud?

2. Can any physicist claim to be a scientist while there is one single experiment in physics which is fraud?

3. Are physicists bound by ethical standards which force them to betray academic party line and defend science?

4. The answer is No.

5. No physicist will never ever exhibit scientific responsibility against the party line.

6. No physicist ever questions how a law of physics can be based on a so-called experiment which is based on three (3) measurements alone. This is a scientific crime. No physicist has the guts to stand up for science to question what kind of law is it that is based on 3 measurements?

7. The fundamental unit of the fundamental quantity in physics has never been measured in an experiment designed to measure this occult quantity on which the British occultist known as Newton based physics.

8. Instead of questioning the occult and non-experimental nature of force physicists invented a superfluous unit and called it Newton. This is like calling Volgograd Stalingrad to save their master’s authority. Are physicists more bound by the authority of Newton than communists were bound by the authority of Stalin? Yes.

9. Physicists know that Cavendish was dead when G was invented. Physicists still repeat the party line that a dead British landed gentry measured the occult soul of Newton in an experiment rather than to show scientific integrity by questioning such idiocy and defend science.

10. Is there no physicists with a minimum of scientific integrity? Or have all physicists second mortgaged whatever scientific integrity they may have had long time ago to save the soul of Newton?

11. Physicists think that if they ignore the chicken shit experiments they know are chicken shit experiments they can still have the right to call themselves scientists? If physics is corrupted how can physicists not be corrupted?

ShareThis