<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/wittens-authority/</link>
	<description>Transfer scientific authority to people</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: A proposal to National Science Foundation at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/wittens-authority/#comment-12746</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/wittens-authority/#comment-12746</guid>
					<description>[...] After writing to Perimeter Institute and Templeton Foundation here&#8217;s my proposal to National Science Foundation. In this case I am emphasizing experimental focus of Freedom of Science. Ninety per cent1 of Doctors of Philosophy licensed to practice research physics2 are paid by NSF. For instance, NSF paid Ed Witten to write about Magic, Mystery and Matrix. We don&#8217;t deal here with Magic or Mystery or puns so there will be no prospect of getting funds from NSF in that department of physical studies. Nevertheless it may be a good idea to ask Carl Brannen who sends occasional dispatches from the future about the prospects of Freedom of Science vis-a-vis funding by NSF. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] After writing to Perimeter Institute and Templeton Foundation here&#8217;s my proposal to National Science Foundation. In this case I am emphasizing experimental focus of Freedom of Science. Ninety per cent1 of Doctors of Philosophy licensed to practice research physics2 are paid by NSF. For instance, NSF paid Ed Witten to write about Magic, Mystery and Matrix. We don&#8217;t deal here with Magic or Mystery or puns so there will be no prospect of getting funds from NSF in that department of physical studies. Nevertheless it may be a good idea to ask Carl Brannen who sends occasional dispatches from the future about the prospects of Freedom of Science vis-a-vis funding by NSF. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scholastic PageRank at Freedom of Science</title>
		<link>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/wittens-authority/#comment-7766</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://globalpioneering.com/wp02/wittens-authority/#comment-7766</guid>
					<description>[...] When a string theorist publishes a commentary and links it to Witten, Witten&#8217;s Scholastic PageRank and therefore his authority increase. That&#8217;s why writing commentary, a vehicle whose sole purpose is to create links,3 has been, and still is, the main activity of scholastic doctors of philosophy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When a string theorist publishes a commentary and links it to Witten, Witten&#8217;s Scholastic PageRank and therefore his authority increase. That&#8217;s why writing commentary, a vehicle whose sole purpose is to create links,3 has been, and still is, the main activity of scholastic doctors of philosophy. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
